An ERISA plan amendment violated the plain language of an existing portion of the plan where the amendment specifically created non-benefit contributions and excluded those non-benefit contributions from the definition of contributions for which contributions would need to be made to a temporarily employed union worker’s home pension fund, and the plan mandated that all contributions received on behalf of temporary workers be transferred to the worker’s home fund.
Lehman v. Nelson - filed Dec. 3, 2019
Cite as 2019 S.O.S. 18-35321
For more information, go to:
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment