October 29, 2012
See?s Candy Shops, Inc. v. Superior Court (Silva) - filed October 29, 2012, Fourth District, Div. One
Cite as D060710
Where
plaintiff sued employer for failing to pay all wages earned, and
employer pled as an affirmative defense that any shortfall in
plaintiff?s pay was a result of a lawful practice of rounding "punch-in"
and "punch-out" times to the nearest one-tenth of an hour for
administrative convenience, trial court erred in granting summary
adjudication to plaintiff on that defense. Assuming a rounding-over-time
policy is neutral, both facially and as applied, the practice is proper
under California law because its net effect is to permit employers to
efficiently calculate hours worked without imposing any burden on
employees.
beverlyhillsemploymentlaw.com/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment