Teamsters Local 2010 v. Regents of the University of California

A reasonable trier of fact could find that a bulletin issued by a public university was an attempt to influence the decision of employees as to the issue of unionization, even though the bulletin professed the university’s neutrality on the issue, the bulletin was couched in terms of providing employees with facts, and it did not threaten the employees with reprisals if they unionized. While noncoercive communications falling under Government Code §3571.3 will not qualify as unfair labor practices, such communications may still violate §16645.6.

Teamsters Local 2010 v. Regents of the University of California - filed Sept. 30, 2019, First District, Div. Five

Cite as 2019 S.O.S. 2903

For more information, go to: 

http://www.beverlyhillsemploymentlaw.com