Morgan v. Wet Seal, Inc., 210 Cal. App. 4th 1341 (2012)
Crystal
Morgan and two other former employees sued Wet Seal because the company
allegedly required employees to purchase Wet Seal clothing and
merchandise as a condition of employment and also failed to reimburse
employees for their mileage between Wet Seal business locations. The
trial court denied class certification on the ground that common
questions do not predominate over individual questions. The court of
Appeal affirmed, holding that Wet Seal's policies did not require
employees to wear Wet Seal clothing, providing only that employees must
dress in a manner "consistent with current fashion style that is
reflected in the stores." As for the travel expense claim, the court
held that plaintiffs had essentially conceded that "Wet Seal's travel
reimbursement practice was not consistent across the board."
For More Information Contact us at:
http://beverlyhillsemploymentlaw.com/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment