Lui v. City and County of San Francisco, 211 Cal. App. 4th 962 (2012)
After
suffering a major heart attack, Kenneth Lui retired from his position
as a police officer with the San Francisco Police Department. After the
Department informed him there were no administrative positions available
that did not require him to perform the strenuous duties regularly
performed by patrol officers in the field, he sued for disability
discrimination under the Fair Employment and Housing Act. The trial
court entered judgment in favor of the Department, and the Court of
Appeal affirmed, holding that even though officers in administrative
positions are not frequently required to engage in strenuous physical
activity, the ability to perform such duties is essential because the
Department has a legitimate need to be able to deploy officers in those
positions in the event of emergencies and other mass mobilizations. See also Furtado v. State Personnel Bd., 2013
WL 64657 (Cal. Ct. App. 2013) (peace officer was properly demoted
because he was unable to perform the essential functions of his job with
or without accommodation); Basurto v. Imperial Irrigation Dist., 211
Cal. App. 4th 866 (2012) (public... employee's civil claims for age and
race discrimination were barred under principles of estoppel and res
judicata by a prior adverse administrative decision of the district's
governing board); Edgerly v. City of Oakland, 2012 WL 6194390
(Cal. Ct. App. 2012) (former city administrator who was allegedly
terminated for refusing to violate the city's charter, municipal code
and civil service rules and resolutions could not state claim for
violation of the statewide whistleblower statute, Labor Code § 1102.5).
For More Information Contact us at:
http://beverlyhillsemploymentlaw.com/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment