Riverside County to pay $490K in case naming health official
By
DavE Downey • U-T
12:01 a.m.Jan. 17, 2013Updated3:31 p.m.Jan. 16, 2013
Riverside County will pay almost a half million dollars to settle a
sexual harassment suit that named a former top health official, a lawyer
for the plaintiff said this week. County spokesman Ray Smith confirmed the $490,000 amount, saying the
settlement was approved by the Board of Supervisors late last year. The deal settles a lawsuit brought against the county in 2011 by Pamela
Luna, who formerly worked as interim administrator of health and
community programs for First 5 Riverside. First 5 Riverside is an agency that funds programs promoting the
development of young children up to age 5. Luna worked there from May
2010 to August 2011. During her employment with the agency, Luna was the target of “unwanted
and inappropriate advances” from Dr. Eric Frykman, said San Diego
lawyer Joshua D. Gruenberg, who represented Luna. “In addition to verbally harassing Dr. Luna, Dr. Frykman repeatedly and
openly ogled her, and touched her without her consent,” Gruenberg stated
in a news release. “Attempts to investigate and resolve the harassment
were not taken seriously at any level of the county’s chain of command,
leaving Ms. Luna twisting in the wind until she was terminated in
retaliation for her complaints.” At the time, Frykman was serving as Riverside County’s public health
officer and Community Health Agency director. Frykman resigned the post
in September 2011, and a short time later Cameron Kaiser was selected as
the interim health officer.
Frykman did not immediately return a telephone call placed to his Riverside-area medical office on Wednesday seeking comment. Upon her termination, Luna sued the county, Frykman and other county
employees, alleging unlawful harassment and retaliation, Gruenberg said.
She sought damages for emotional and physical trauma, loss of economic
opportunity and loss of reputation.
According to Smith, an internal county investigation and independent
review by a consultant in 2011 found nothing to substantiate the claims. On Tuesday, Smith said, “For various reasons, the county believes this was the best resolution of the case.”Smith said the board approved the settlement on Nov. 6.“It required signatures from the other parties,” he said.“And it was finally signed by everyone who was required to sign off on the settlement November 26.”
For More Information Contact us at:
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment