Contributors

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

McVeigh v. Recology San Francisco


Plaintiff claiming retaliation under the whistleblower provision of the California False Claims Act need not show that a CFCA action based on plaintiff’s disclosures would have been successful. It is sufficient to show that there was probable cause for plaintiff to believe the facts disclosed constituted a CFCA violation. Labor Code whistleblower provision prohibits employer from retaliating against plaintiff for disclosing wrongdoing by fellow employees or by the employer.
     
McVeigh v. Recology San Francisco - filed January 31, 2013, First District, Div. Three
     Cite as A131833

For More Information Contact us at:

No comments:

Post a Comment